Posts Tagged: Banana News


22
Oct 09

Wasteful – but innovative – banana packaging

Image from USA Today.

The reason we have only one kind of banana – out of the 1,000+ found worldwide – is partly an issue of transportation: every banana type ripens differently and has widely varying levels of fragility. In the 1950s, when the “original” commercial banana, the Gros Michel, was going functionally extinct, Dole came up with the idea of bagging and boxing a potential replacement fruit – the Cavendish – in order to allow it to survive the long trip from the tropics to our stores. The plan worked, and the banana industry was saved.

Today, as disease ravages the global Cavendish crop, packing and shipping technologies are once again becoming key to replacing the commercial fruit. At the same time, bananas compete more and more with candy and other junk food at convenience stores, where branding and presentation beyond an oval sticker might be a plus (at least in terms of marketing.)

Del Monte and 7-Eleven seem to believe just that and have begun, at about 30 stores near the convenience store giant’s Dallas headquarters, a small retail test of bagged and branded bananas. The packaging is designed to extend the shelf-life of the fruit from two to five days. (I’m not sure how the convenience store chain came up with those timeframes, actually. Bananas should be able to stay on sale for more than 48 hours if handled properly.) “Our customers want yellow bananas — not brown,” Joseph DePinto, CEO of the convenience chain, told USA Today. (I’ve written about convenience store fruit before. It hasn’t really worked out that well for the big banana companies.)

Since I’m not in Texas, I haven’t handled the packaging, but from the picture, it looks a lot like something a high-end produce distributor called Melissa’s uses for plantain sold in California supermarkets; Chiquita also made a try with a similar form of packaging a few years ago. It used a membrane-like coating and a special device that separated the fruit; the system was designed by a Boston consultancy called Gen3 Partners; you can read about the product here.

In a published case study, Gen3 quotes Chiquita as saying: “We have been in business for over one hundred years. We need to shake up our markets with new innovation.” Environmentalists rightly see this kind of innovation as problematic, and I agree,  but with mixed feelings. I’d be happy if the new wrappers somehow made the fruit a more likely buy – over junk food – at convenience stores.

The bigger issue is that new production technology is desperately needed in the banana world – though not necessarily to make the fruit a convenience store favorite.  The fruit industry continues to rely on Cavendish, and only Cavendish. That fruit is doomed (read my book or see this article), and no amount of packaging can change that. But in order to save bananas as a consumer product, the industry will need to develop new technologies to deliver new bananas to consumers – just as Dole did fifty years ago, and tougher, ripeness-delaying packaging will be a part of that. Is this particular experiment a step in the right direction? Not sure – but it is a step.


22
Jun 09

British Supermarket "Banana Hammocks"

New banana shelving at British markets. Photo: Guardian.

Tesco, the British supermarket chain, is unveiling what is the first real change in the way bananas are sold and displayed in stores since the variety of fruit we eat today – called Cavendish – arrived in the 1960s to replace its disease-destroyed predecessor. (Our Cavendish is a fragile, and had to be bagged and boxed; the older fruit, Gros Michel, was tough, and was simply sent to stores in giant bunches.) Tesco’s “hammocks,” pictured above, cradle the fruit, preventing it from bruising.

Though the primary motivator seems to be preventing waste – tons of roughed-up Cavendish are discarded each year – a second advantage, a Tesco produce manager told the Guardian newspaper, is that the shelving allows the chain to fine-tune ripeness, offering fruit at “all stages” between yellow and green.

What’s most interesting isn’t what this means for the banana industry now, but for the future. With the Cavendish breed under attack by a deadly and incurable fungus, new breeds are eventually going to arrive at our stores. From what we know, they are likely to be varieties even more fragile than the fruit we eat today. While this is primarily a problem at the growing and shipping end of the banana supply chain, developing ways to present and maintain delicate fruit to consumers is also key.  Tesco seems to have made a huge leap in solving that problem.


7
Jun 09

A Guide to Those "Baby" Bananas – and What They Prove

on_bananacostume_baby.jpg

Huggable, lovable – but not the kind of baby banana that I’m talking about.

Though the vast majority of bananas we buy – statistically, all – are of the endangered Cavendish variety, there’s a good chance you’ve seen something else, these days and if you’re a banana-type (or have become one), you might have wondered: what are those little bananas?

Both Chiquita and Dole offer versions of the half-sized fruit, with Chiquita selling them under the “Minis” brand, and Dole offering them as “Baby” bananas.

In the “big” banana world, there’s absolutely no difference between what Chiquita, Dole (or any other commercial banana importer) sells: everything is Cavendish. Action surrounds small-time fruit. For the first time in over a century, the two biggest banana companies are slugging it out for a market niche with different varieties.

The Chiquita “Mini” is a breed called Pisang Mas, originally from Malaysia, but now – like all bananas imported to the U.S. – grown in Latin America.

Dole actually sells three different varieties under the Baby band nameOrito, Lady Finger, and Manzano.

The fruit are tough to find, since they’re in various stages of test-marketing, as well as subject to seasonal variation. They also cost about three times as much as their ordinary counterparts. But they’re worth seeking out, and not just because they prove – possibly for the first time to the average American consumer – that there’s something beyond the generic banana. Though the four types share some characteristics (beyond size), they’re also quite different from each other.

I’ve put together a guide to the four varieties, but one caveat: no great banana arrives easily. Dole doesn’t distinguish between the three types it offers – they’re all labelled the same – so side-by-side taste tests are going to be tough. But persevere. The results will be worth it (and ignore the for-kids marketing that the banana giants have attached to the product. Sure, they are great after school, as Chiquita’s says. But this isn’t baby food.)

Oh, and one more thing, and you MUST do this, or else your adventure in little bananas will surely fail: LITTLE BANANAS TASTE HORRIBLE UNTIL THEY’RE RIPE – AND RIPE, FOR LITTLE BANANAS, IS NOT YELLOW! You need to let the fruit turn brown or else it will not be sweet or soft enough. This will go against every banana extinct you have been trained to adhere to. Trust me.


CHIQUITA’S PISANG MAS (BRAND NAME: MINI)

NEW MINIS CLUSTERsm



  • Super sweet – but only when very ripe. This is a fruit that is awesome when “peaking,” but the peak can be hard to catch. When not peaking, not so good.
  • Thin-skinned, so it bruises easily.
  • IDENTIFYING: Easy. The only one Chiquita sells.

DOLE’S BABY (TYPE II – ORITO):

Orito

Orito Banana, from Ecuador’s Goldenforce.

  • Possibly the sweetest of the four varieties – making it (when ripe – see above) one of the best bananas for smoothies.
  • Grown almost exclusively in Ecuador, where labor laws are weak, making this a very high-margin, high-political cost fruit.
  • Identification: Chubby. If the country of origin is Ecuador, almost definitely Orito.

DOLE BABY (TYPE II – LADY FINGER):

ladyfinger

Ladyfinger, meet Cavendish. Photo: Australian Tropical Fruits Portal


  • Similar peaking/ripening characteristics as Pisang Mas.
  • Doesn’t easily turn brown when cut, making it perfect for fruit salads.
  • Susceptible to Panama Disease Race One, the malady that killed the first worldwide commercial banana crop – and which still exists today.
  • Closer to a mini-Cavendish in appearance. Slender(ish.) Super popular in Australia, so if you’ve got an Aussie in tow ask him or her for identification help.

DOLE BABY (TYPE III – MANZANO/APPLE):

MANAZANO

The chubby Manzano, or “apple” banana. Photo: Thrifty Foods

  • Falls into the “apple” banana category – giving it a unique, tangy-sweet taste. Much less bland than our Cavendish, but some banana marketers have traditionally believed that consumers would reject such a different-flavored fruit.
  • Definitely the most “gourmet” banana of the bunch.
  • Small ripeness/sweetness issue. Can be eaten a little bit less brown if you like the tart flavor, but you must wait beyond brown – until the skin is black – for the highest sugar content (which will give you a fabulous, multi-dimensional bite.)
  • Difficult to grow in wet, lowland conditions
  • Easier to find than others – sold under many brand names (or none at all) in Latin markets, where it is often a Mexican import.
  • Identification tips: Significantly fatter, chunkier than Cavendish and probably the other little bananas, as well.

Once you’ve tried a couple, it’s worth thinking a bit about what this all means in a world where the single fruit that we generally eat is threatened with practical extinction. The arrival of these alternate bananas in our markets shows that variety is possible, and that the commercial banana companies are willing to experiment with it (even with the for-kids-only marketing tilt.)

Despite this, the banana companies are likely very hesitant to move the fruit into any testing beyond these niches. The reason is that – according to conventional industry wisdom – there’s simply too much “wrong” with the pint-sized fruit. The main arguments against mainstreaming mini-bananas include:

  • Ripening. All of these fruit must be quite dark to taste good. The banana companies are (rightly?) afraid that the typical consumer is so well conditioned toward seeing a golden banana as perfect that wider acceptance would simply never occur.
  • Production. The varieties in question can’t be grown as broadly, geographically speaking, as Cavendish. There probably isn’t enough land in Latin America to make any one of these varieties anything near to a market share winner.
  • Shipping: These are thin-skinned fruit. Today’s banana supply chain is so industrialized that the little fruit don’t fit into it, requiring costly “custom” handling all along the way. For an industry built on turning an exotic tropical fruit into a commodity as cheap and ubiquitous as a fast-food burger, the idea of reinventing itself to handle more complex products may feel both financially and culturally risky.
  • Marketing. People buy bananas by the bunch. Would the price/weight equation shift with a smaller banana as our main choice, or even as a more prominent alternate? The banana has been America’s favorite fruit – by far – since the 1920s. Changing the very size, shape, and price of that fruit into something completely new would be a terrifying prospect for the banana companies, which introduced the fruit to us, struggled to make it our favorite, and have fought – often spilling blood – to keep it exactly the same ever since.

Despite all this, change has to come.

All of these arguments are based on a single premise: that the banana we eat today will last forever. It won’t. It might not even last a decade.

The truth is that, as a living organism, all bananas have strengths, and all bananas have weaknesses. The biggest weakness the world’s banana crop has today, though, has nothing to do with the fruit itself: it has to do with the human folly of relying on a single variety to feed millions.

The half-sized varieties from Chiquita and Dole are not, I’m told, doing all that well at the market. Some of Dole’s farms in Ecuador that were devoted to the Orito fruit are reported to have closed. But the proof of concept – getting the fruit from there to here, figuring out how to market and sell it - has been accomplished, and despite my frequent criticism of the banana companies, there’s credit deserved for that.

The experiment, however, needs to be seen as more than just marketing. The biological common sense – and necessity – of breaking the Cavendish monoculture needs to be acknowledged, as well. It is in combining salesmanship with this common sense that will lead the industry away from the dead end it is now rapidly heading toward. The “Mini” and “Baby” fruit provide a blueprint – even, focused as it is on children, it appears to have been written in crayon.


7
May 09

Star Trek Day at Bananabook.org – and a new T-Shirt of the Month…

The new movie is out. To celebrate (OK, this is a stretch) I offer this post, featuring a t-shirt I encountered when I went to see a lecture by George Takei – aka Mr. Sulu, of the original version of the series, and the subsequent movies – at the California Institute of Technology last month. The organizer wore an awesome banana-themed shirt.

IMG_0023


Backstory on the shirt: the organizer told me that a couple of years ago, a banana scavenger hunt was held on campus. Students were required to steal as many different variations on the fruit as they could – pictures, books, or actual edible product. The garment was home-designed as a symbol of the merry adventure.
(Also: the speech was amazing. Takei is a gay-rights activist, and he told the story of how, as a boy, he was among those Japanese-Americans forcibly removed to internment camps during World War II, and how the loss of civil rights for his family was no different than it is today for gays denied the right – among others – to marriage. Somehow, Takei managed to credibly link this to the vision of the future that Star Trek – and especially Star Trek creator Gene Rodenberry – first brought to the screen in the 1960s. I completely bought it, but of course, I’m already on board, as my secret past indicates.)
And – not unbelievably, if you’re a fan – Memory Alpha, the online ST compendium of everything, actually includes TWO banana-related entries in its official encyclopedia of the nearly fifty-year-old cultural phenomenon. Here and here and here.
And yes, the film opened today. I’ve timed this post to appear literally as I’m sitting down to see it in Hollywood’s fabulous Cinerama Dome!

30
Apr 09

Australian Bananas – only – for Australian Flights

EVIDENCE: Qantas passenger Toni Rogers found this non-Aussie sticker on her in-flight banana. Image: Cairns Post.
Australia and the Philippines both have banana problems: Panama Disease, the wilt that threatens the world’s commercial banana crop, is present in both places. Australia’s banana industry is reeling from the malady, which it is attempting – with little success –  to contain by quarantining infected plantations.
The controversy began two weeks ago, when a passenger on a flight from New Zealand noticed that the Cavendish banana she was served bore a Philippine sticker. Within days, Australian banana growers and politicians were demanding Qantas stop serving non-native fruit – both as an issue of national pride and to protect the country’s banana crop. At first, the airline resisted, but last week, it gave in.
So, is this “threat” for real? Panama Disease is easy to spread. A little bit of dirt could conceivably
begin a chain of infection for a continent. But there’s not much dirt on a washed, picked banana that comes to an airport caterer from a wholesale grocer, as the fruit served aboard Qantas at either end of its flights does. Randy Ploetz, one of the top researchers in Panama Disease –  he identified the strain that is currently spreading worldwide – says that “the probability of this being a problem seems pretty remote. I’d see this mainly as a symbolic gesture in support of their ongoing campaign.”
I agree – though I’m not sure what the symbolism represents to dismayed Philippine growers, or to passengers on inbound Qantas flights who now have to satisfy themselves with peanuts.

16
Mar 09

Banana Nut Cheerios: Review and Rant

Cheerios

You can barely see the bananas on the package, and the product itself could do with a bit more banana flavor, too.

You will think I’m a lousy sourpuss for saying this, but there are WAY too many kinds of Cheerios. But that’s because you probably don’t know how many kinds: Eleven. That’s right. With the addition of the new banana-nut flavor, you now need your toes to count the number of varieties of America’s favorite breakfast food that are currently available on store shelves.

Lots of Cheerios

I don’t care how much you love Cheerios. Eleven kinds? That’s insane! (There are two Yogurt Burst flavors; only one is shown.)

The other thing that’s totally sucky about Cheerios is the brand’s constant harping on the “fact” that eating it “may” reduce the risk of heart disease. SHENANIGANS and BOGOSITY! Not eating a lot of bacon may reduce the risk of heart disease, and Cheerios may a breakfast delight, but can’t cereal just be advertised as something that tastes good, even if two of the Cheerios varieties are shameless imitations Kellogg’s Froot Loops and Apple Jacks – a couple of the best-tasting bowl-and-milk horrors ever created? (See links below for the actual health claims, and why they’re the bunk.)

Aa far as eating the new variety goes, I’d say the banana taste could be more pronounced, and I’m not sure the overall concept of putting banana in the cereal itself (rather than into the bowl with cereal, as has been done since Chiquita came up with the idea, nearly a century ago – the story of the development of bananas+cereal as a recipe is in my book) is a step in a good direction. Still, I rank the product pretty high on the breakfast taste scale. Bonus points for doing it without artificial flavors. If you like Cheerios, they’re worth trying.

General Mills has a special Banana Nut Cheerios website, with a movie, nutritional info, recipes, and a 55-cents off coupon. There are also some “banana fun facts,” some of which are – if not wrong – then poorly worded (like this one: “There is no such thing as a banana tree. Bananas grow on plants.” I think what they mean to say is that bananas are an herb, or that bananas grow on what are basically stems.)

More about Banana Nut Cheerios (including coupon) here.

Crazy, hyped, manipulative nutritional claims about the cereal brand here. Info on why those claims are completely bogus here.

From Deroks awesome page devoted to bloody breakfast.

Bonus breakfast suggestion – thinking about Cheerios for your kids? Consider that the vampiric occult treat, also from General Mills, contains THE SAME AMOUNT OF ADDED SUGAR – twelve grams per 27 gram serving – than at least two Cheerios varieties – Apple Cinnamon and Frosted (Banana Nut comes close, with nine grams.) And much of Count Chocula’s sugar is delivered in the optimal form of marshmallows. Manufacturer’s nutritional claims for Count Chocula: none. Suggested nutritional claim: feed this to your kids and they will grow up to be INTERESTING. The image of the demonic dark lord of daybreak delight comes from Derok, and you can learn ever more here.


2
Dec 08

Dole, Others Sued in U.S for Ecuador Pesticides

This exclusive report copyright 2008 www.bananabook.org.

Two of the world’s biggest banana companies, the American chemical companies who supply them, along with several other companies they do business with, are being sued by pilots, ground crew, and residents of the Ecuadorian plantation town of Puerto Viejo for health damage they allegedly suffered during years of spraying of Mancozeb, a fungicide used to combat Black Sigatoka, the most common and costly disease affecting commercial bananas.

The suit was filed in the Superior Court of the District of Columbia (Washington, D.C.) on September 18, 2008. It names Dole, Monsanto, Dupont, Dow Chemical and Noboa – which markets bananas in the U.S. under the “Bonita” brand name – as primary defendants, and accuses them of using the chemical despite knowing that it would cause birth defects, cancer, and respiratory and fertility problems among banana workers and their families.

Mancozeb is listed by the Pesticde Action Network as having “toxicity to humans, including carcinogenicity, reproductive and developmental toxicity, neurotoxicity, and acute toxicity.” Mancozeb is a fairly common garden fungicide, and the U.S. EPA regards it as safe, but only in small quantities and with proper protective gear and usage. The suit alleges all were lacking.

The suit is one of several that banana companies are facing and have faced in U.S. courts for their actions overseas. Last year, Dole received a mixed verdict in a similar pesticide suit involving Nicaraguan workers, with some receiving damages, and some charges being dismissed. Chiquita is currently being sued by families who allege that payments the company made to Colombian terrorist groups directly funded activities that led to the deaths of their loved ones.


18
Nov 08

Obama’s Pick For Attorney General Has Banana Problems

Eric Holder, Chiquita defender and Obama pick for U.S. Attorney General.

I’ve gotten dozens of emails in the 48 hours since Eric Holder emerged as President-elect Barack Obama’s choice as U.S. Attorney General. To summarize: Holder is a former deputy U.S. attorney general in the Clinton administration who has been described as a “long-time Obama advisor.” He was part of the committee that helped Obama choose Joe Biden as vice-presidential nominee. Holder would be the nation’s first African-American attorney general. He’s currently in private practice with the law firm of Covington & Burling, which is where the banana trouble begins.

Here’s the key part of the Wikipedia page on Holder that explains it (I urge you to read the whole entry, which summarizes his entire career.)

“In 2004, Holder helped negotiate an agreement with the Justice Department for Chiquita Brands International in a case that involved Chiquita’s payment of “protection money” to the United Self-Defense Forces of Colombia, a group on the U.S. government’s list of terrorist organizations. In the agreement, Chiquita’s officials pleaded guilty and paid a fine of $25 million. Holder represents Chiquita in the civil action that grew out of this criminal case.”

The civil action mentioned in the article is a lawsuit on behalf of the families of seven missionaries who were murdered by Colombia’s United Self Defense Forces (AUC). The suit alleges that since Chiquita was funding the AUC at the times the killings occurred, the banana company bears some responsibility for them.

I agree, and I’ve blogged about the issue numerous times. Here are links to some of the previous entries:

  • In May, the CBS News program “60 Minutes” did a segment on the Colombia-Chiquita story. It included an interview with Chiquita CEO Fernando Aguirre. Read (and view the interview) here.
  • Here’s the entry about the lawsuits that Holder and his law firm, Covington and Burling, are defending Chiquita against.
  • The families of U.S. victims of the AUC aren’t the only ones suing Chiquita. Similar cases have been brought by 400 Colombian families. My November, 2007 entry on is here.

So what to do about this?

Silence isn’t an option. Anyone who reads this blog knows where my political sympathies lie. I was, and remain, and Obama supporter. I know that the Washington merry-go-round – and especially when it comes to attorneys – makes for strange bedfellows. I don’t know if I’d excuse the fact that Holder represented Chiquita in negotiating the terms of the fine it paid to the Justice Department. But I know that representing the company against the families of the AUC victims is inexcusable. As my colleague Jason Glaser – whose upcoming documentary, “The Affected,” directly illustrates how dangerous the lives of banana workers in Latin America are, even when they don’t have to deal with terrorism – notes, “isn’t it about time we have a lawyer in [the U.S. attorney general's] position from a plaintiff’s firm [italics mine], someone who may have at one time served the interests of a mammal as opposed to a corporate entity?”

The liberal/progressive community is going to do a lot of hand-wringing about this. It needs to do more. We elected Obama – and we need to keep him honest. To fail to do so would be to write him the same kind of blank check that supporters of the previous administration handed over to the officials they elected. Holder owes us an explanation, though I don’t see how any words from him could be convincing – especially to those in Latin America whose trust we have already lost. Getting Chiquita to agree to agree to full disclosure and restitution would be an appropriate way for Holder to spend his remaining weeks in the private sector – and a good start.

So here’s what to do.

First, learn about Holder – not just about his actions regarding Chiquita, but his entire career. Decide for yourself whether he deserves a pass. Then, use the network – the one we used so successfully to get Obama elected. Blog, Twitter, and email the links about Holder that you think are most important, good or bad (my Twitter handle is “soulbarn”, if you want to follow my posts.) The point is to make sure the information gets out there. The most important thing we can do right now is establish, early, that transparency is one of the things we voted for on November 4th.  Our ability to spread this information quickly, and spark a public debate about it – rather than use this information simply in a destructive way – is key.

Here are some good places to find out more about Holder, and to discuss the nomination. I invite you to add more links in the comment thread.

  • Dan Kovalik, in the Huffington Post (11/18/08), not mincing words. Headline: “Lawyer for Chiquita in Colombia Death Squad Case May be Next U.S. Attorney General.”
  • Discussion thread at Democratic Underground forums.
  • Slate’s “Bananas of Mass Destruction” (2007), including Chiquita’s court filings.
  • “The Trouble With Eric Holder,” from The Nation, 11/18/08. Not just bananas – Holder, according to the story, also has some Patriot Act issues.
  • “Preliminary Facts and Thoughts About Eric Holder,” from Salon, 11/18/08. A still-being-updated, roundup on Holder’s dealings, positive and negative.

Do you enjoy reading the Banana Blog? Consider making a donation to help keep the flow of banana news coming. Or buy my book.


7
Nov 08

Online Course in Banana Quarantine Techniques

185.jpg

Philippine Lacatan banana tree at market – from the extensive and fascinating Market Manilla website. The Lacatan is the Philippine’s “comfort food” banana, and one of the world’s most delicious.

One of the most frustrating elements of fighting banana disease (or any disease) is that quarantine actually works – but only in theory. For over a century, attempts to isolate infected bananas from healthy ones have been attempted, and failed. These efforts have, in fact, generally made things worse, because they’ve often been accompanied by denial on the part of banana producers that the problem needs to be attacked on other levels, as well (or denial that quarantine is mostly ineffective.)

But clean farming can make a difference: it can boost crop yields, and slow the spread of disease – crucially important to subsistence farmers, for whom even cutting a percentage of loss can be lifesaving. And there have been considerable successes in some recent quarantine programs. Pakistani officials are now offering a pilot program in managing banana diseases that’s different from traditional efforts, which have usually involved in the field training. This one is all-electronic. In my book, I describe how ambitious field programs in Pakistan failed in the early part of this decade. I don’t know whether on-site instruction works better than these self-paced versions – but the Philippines is both a banana paradise (with huge plantations and breeding variety) and a center of banana disease, so the effort is absolutely necessary.

Here’s how the course introduces itself to first-time participants:

“Have you experienced tremendous yield loss in your banana due to diseases? Have you tried several methods to combat these, yet all proved ineffective? Well, worry no more for you just found the right niche that’ll shun away your farming woes. Congratulations! You are about to start the journey towards achieving a high quality, disease-free banana. Welcome to the online course on Managing Common Diseases in Banana!”

I guess every school needs cheerleaders. Here’s a direct link (registration required) to the nine-part program, which is called “Managing Common Disease in Banana.”


29
Oct 08

Banana Companies Rat Each Other Out

goodfellas-drei-jahrzehnte-in-der-mafia-wallpaper-1-1024.jpg

The biggest news item I avoid in this blog are banana trade wars. That’s because it would take me thousands and thousands of words to explain why the U.S., Europe, and the big banana companies have been fighting for years over who gets to sell bananas where. There have been resolutions that have led to no resolutions, problems that have led to more problems, and lots of ugly behavior on both sides. Suffice it to say that the whole thing is corrupt, and that none of it really affects whether or not bananas show up on store shelves (though it does affect where those bananas come from, and prices, as you’ll see, below.) The problem is that when you enter the labyrinth, you just can’t find your way back. Sorry.

But sometimes, I just have to say something. Last week, Dole and Del Monte – Dole’s the second biggest banana company in the world, and Del Monte, depending on how you count, is probably third or fourth – were fined a total of $83 million by the European Union for conspiring to fix banana prices in Austria, Belgium, Denmark, Finland, Germany, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, and Sweden. These fines were good. Price-fixing is bad, and I’m always happy – we should all be happy – when banana company skullduggery is exposed.

The interesting thing about all this is who turned the Dole and Del Monte in: it was Chiquita, their rival, and the world’s biggest banana company.

This time, I won’t comment, other than to refer you to the source of the picture, above.