March, 2009


16
Mar 09

Banana Nut Cheerios: Review and Rant

Cheerios

You can barely see the bananas on the package, and the product itself could do with a bit more banana flavor, too.

You will think I’m a lousy sourpuss for saying this, but there are WAY too many kinds of Cheerios. But that’s because you probably don’t know how many kinds: Eleven. That’s right. With the addition of the new banana-nut flavor, you now need your toes to count the number of varieties of America’s favorite breakfast food that are currently available on store shelves.

Lots of Cheerios

I don’t care how much you love Cheerios. Eleven kinds? That’s insane! (There are two Yogurt Burst flavors; only one is shown.)

The other thing that’s totally sucky about Cheerios is the brand’s constant harping on the “fact” that eating it “may” reduce the risk of heart disease. SHENANIGANS and BOGOSITY! Not eating a lot of bacon may reduce the risk of heart disease, and Cheerios may a breakfast delight, but can’t cereal just be advertised as something that tastes good, even if two of the Cheerios varieties are shameless imitations Kellogg’s Froot Loops and Apple Jacks – a couple of the best-tasting bowl-and-milk horrors ever created? (See links below for the actual health claims, and why they’re the bunk.)

Aa far as eating the new variety goes, I’d say the banana taste could be more pronounced, and I’m not sure the overall concept of putting banana in the cereal itself (rather than into the bowl with cereal, as has been done since Chiquita came up with the idea, nearly a century ago – the story of the development of bananas+cereal as a recipe is in my book) is a step in a good direction. Still, I rank the product pretty high on the breakfast taste scale. Bonus points for doing it without artificial flavors. If you like Cheerios, they’re worth trying.

General Mills has a special Banana Nut Cheerios website, with a movie, nutritional info, recipes, and a 55-cents off coupon. There are also some “banana fun facts,” some of which are – if not wrong – then poorly worded (like this one: “There is no such thing as a banana tree. Bananas grow on plants.” I think what they mean to say is that bananas are an herb, or that bananas grow on what are basically stems.)

More about Banana Nut Cheerios (including coupon) here.

Crazy, hyped, manipulative nutritional claims about the cereal brand here. Info on why those claims are completely bogus here.

From Deroks awesome page devoted to bloody breakfast.

Bonus breakfast suggestion – thinking about Cheerios for your kids? Consider that the vampiric occult treat, also from General Mills, contains THE SAME AMOUNT OF ADDED SUGAR – twelve grams per 27 gram serving – than at least two Cheerios varieties – Apple Cinnamon and Frosted (Banana Nut comes close, with nine grams.) And much of Count Chocula’s sugar is delivered in the optimal form of marshmallows. Manufacturer’s nutritional claims for Count Chocula: none. Suggested nutritional claim: feed this to your kids and they will grow up to be INTERESTING. The image of the demonic dark lord of daybreak delight comes from Derok, and you can learn ever more here.


4
Mar 09

Exclusive: Developer of Disease-Resistant, Supermarket Banana Explains How it Works

Australian banana researcher James Dale. Image: QUT

The race to save our supermarket banana from disease is on, and a scientist in Australia – aided by a grant from the Gates Foundation – says that he and his team have developed a genetically modified version of the fruit (the term they use is “biofortification”) that successfully resists the blight that has destroyed much of the banana industry in his country, and that threatens the world’s entire banana crop. I interviewed James Dale for my book. Back then, he talked about how difficult banana breeding is. That remains the case – but this development is a major breakthrough, though he estimates that it will be as long as decade before the fruit he’s working with truly proves its worth.

I first wrote about the breakthrough last year. Here’s a more extensive interview with Dale that I conducted in January. In it, he gives details on the project – and where it might be going.

DK: Panama Disease is highly transmittable – I wonder about how you’re able to actually test these resistant plants that you’ve developed, especially in a country that’s already got a huge problem with the disease. Aren’t you and the Australian banana industry concerned that – since you have to expose these plants to PD – you might inadvertently let something escape?

JAMES: Needless to say, there would be concern about doing those challenges even in the glasshouse. So yes, the bio-security people are very, very concerned about this. Our tests are either going to be conducted where the disease already exists – in the Northern Territory – but also in Southeast Asia. Right now, we’re negotiating where to conduct those trials.

DK: So right now, you’ve only tested against Tropical Race 4 in the greenhouse?

JAMES: No, we haven’t tested against Race 4 in the greenhouse – we’ve so far only tested against Race 1 in the greenhouse.

Note: Panama Disease has different variations. Tropical Race 1 is the “original” version that killed the first commercial banana, the Gros Michel. The Cavendish – our banana – replaced that fruit in the 1950s and 1960s because it was immune to Race 1. Tropical Race 4 appeared in the 1990s, shocking the banana world because it affected the Cavendish, and beginning the race to find a remedy for the blight. The technical name for these disease is “Fusarium Wilt.”

DK: Would resistance to Race 4 necessarily be carried over?

JAMES: We believe so – the hypothesis is that there’s no reason to think that the genes we’re working with in Cavendish won’t provide resistance to Race 4.

DK: Cavendish is already resistant to Race 1 – that’s why it was adopted – so how is that a legitmate test?

JAMES: We have generated transgenic Lady finger expressing the resistance genes. Lady finger is susceptible to both Race 1 and tropical Race 4. We have challenged these transgenic lines in the glasshouse with Race 1 and have identified a number of highly resistant lines. The resistance strategy is not targeted to Race 1 but is targeted to inhibiting a basic infection process of Fusarium. Therefore, we believe there is a reasonable chance that the genes that provide resistance to Race 1 in Lady finger will also provide resistance to Race 4 in Cavendish. But we still need to do the challenges.

Continue reading →


4
Mar 09

Banana Price Watch – New Record!

We all know things are expensive in Alaska. How expensive? You can’t see the price tag, but my girlfriend – who is visiting there this week – reports that these rather weak (they’ve traveled far) looking bunches at a supermarket in Dutch Harbor (the Aleutian island home of “The Deadliest Catch” television program) went for a whopping $2.49 a pound. That’s more than triple what we’re paying these days in Los Angeles. Unhealthy snacks are even more costly: check out the Doritos.

mostex

mostdor